Journalists face more scrutiny
Will Scheff--The Pitt News (U. Pittsburgh)
Issue date: 9/17/03 Section: News
- Page 1 of 2 next >
(U-WIRE) PITTSBURGH - After The New York Times revealed that Jayson Blair lied, plagiarized and fabricated his way through a short-lived career at that paper, many people in America -- including journalists -- questioned how the field of journalism might change to protect the credibility of newspapers.
"Hardly a day goes by when I don't mention it," said Ari Goldman, associate professor at Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and a former New York Times reporter. "It's the ultimate cautionary tale for journalists. I'm more vigilant towards students who are cutting corners."
Goldman also said that, although increased scrutiny of student journalists' work is likely at just about any university, he's changed his mind about whether it will be harder for students to find jobs.
"At first, I thought that this is a bad thing for all young journalists, but it hasn't proven to be," Goldman said. He described how another Times reporter, Rick Bragg, was fired after using stringers, or freelance journalists, to write his stories.
"What's happened as a result is that they're now giving credit to these stringers, which gives young journalists a chance to shine," Goldman said.
Columbia's tough policies -- which have always included expulsion for any confirmed case of plagiarism -- are echoed by the University of Maryland's Philip Merrill College of Journalism, where Blair attended some classes but lied about graduating from the college.
Associate Dean Chris Callahan said that Blair's case is used to reinforce the importance of ethical standards.
"All we have is our credibility," said Callahan. "That's the basis of the relationship between reader and newspaper."
Callahan doesn't think that Blair's antics caused a drop in readership at the Times or other newspapers, but he does feel that people view papers with a more wary eye.
"What Jayson did was deplorable, not only because it was unprofessional, but also because it brought dishonor to a profession that prides itself on its honor," said Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Executive Editor David Shribman. "I think that he opened our eyes to the possibility of large-scale, concerted, deliberate deceit."
"Hardly a day goes by when I don't mention it," said Ari Goldman, associate professor at Columbia University's Graduate School of Journalism and a former New York Times reporter. "It's the ultimate cautionary tale for journalists. I'm more vigilant towards students who are cutting corners."
Goldman also said that, although increased scrutiny of student journalists' work is likely at just about any university, he's changed his mind about whether it will be harder for students to find jobs.
"At first, I thought that this is a bad thing for all young journalists, but it hasn't proven to be," Goldman said. He described how another Times reporter, Rick Bragg, was fired after using stringers, or freelance journalists, to write his stories.
"What's happened as a result is that they're now giving credit to these stringers, which gives young journalists a chance to shine," Goldman said.
Columbia's tough policies -- which have always included expulsion for any confirmed case of plagiarism -- are echoed by the University of Maryland's Philip Merrill College of Journalism, where Blair attended some classes but lied about graduating from the college.
Associate Dean Chris Callahan said that Blair's case is used to reinforce the importance of ethical standards.
"All we have is our credibility," said Callahan. "That's the basis of the relationship between reader and newspaper."
Callahan doesn't think that Blair's antics caused a drop in readership at the Times or other newspapers, but he does feel that people view papers with a more wary eye.
"What Jayson did was deplorable, not only because it was unprofessional, but also because it brought dishonor to a profession that prides itself on its honor," said Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Executive Editor David Shribman. "I think that he opened our eyes to the possibility of large-scale, concerted, deliberate deceit."
2008 Woodie Awards